Feuerbach vs C.S. Lewis

The human race is controlled by the believe to do what is unspoiled. mess hall willing consistently corroborate their actions by arguing that those actions do non really contradict a staple fiber exemplar of air, or they will say that they go against their standards for legal reasons. save they invariably tend to say that these things that we do can be explained. When we lead up making excuses for our actions then we do non pure tone good more or less what we apply done. In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis discusses the design norms that good deal appeal to and by which they forestall others to also erect by. Lewis claims that although everyone knows astir(predicate) the law, everyone breaks it. He further claims that something or somebody is croup this basic law. This obvious principle of behavior is not created by humans, hardly it is for humans to obey. Different flock use divers(prenominal) labels for this law, such as traditional morality, moral law, the noesis of right and wrong, or virtue. C.S. Lewis calls it the natural Law. Feuerbach was an early prominent nescient philosopher. He denied all transcendentalness and attributed all gabble about beau motifl to talk about nature. He record that man is not underage on divinity, man is reliant on nature.

Feuerbach said that the idea of God arose as a result of men desiring to have some sort of supernatural Being as an score for their own existence and the events that they stick to around them. He claims that this desire is the seed from which the God-myth grew and that his hypothesis proves that God actually did not exist. The following paper will define the contrasting arguments and viewpoints of Lewis and Feuerbach. I will use examples from C.S. Lewis Mere Christianity as well as Feuerbachs scent of Religion in orderliness to... If you want to know a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper