Banning Catcher in the Rye Essay

The backstop in the rye whisky by J. D. Salinger should not be ban in schools based solely on the fact that it is a contentious book that uses harsh language and sexual references. This book is J. D. Salingers freedom of speech, and it is a violation of the first amendment for schools to ban this book. This book is only offer an inside look into what teenagers go through in some testify of their lives.According to the Los Angeles Times, The backstop in the Ryes, profanity and sexual references move scandalized reactions (Rotella 18). Although this book has many sexual references, it is not in any commission as explicit and as bad as what teenagers see and perk nowadays on television and in the world. Holden occasion wholey thinks and talks rough sex Most guys at Pencey talked about having sexual intercourse with girls all the time. (Salinger 48).The average teenager often thinks and talks about sex. It is not bizarre for teenagers to do this. The profanity in this book i s also not as bad as it may seem. Patty Salazar, a concerned pay back and religious activist, claims that, It uses the Lords name in vain cc times (Rotella 17), but the curse words used in The Catcher in the Rye argon aught that teenagers have not hear before in their everyday lives. Banning The Catcher in the Rye in school is not acceptable.It is a violation of the first amendment, and it is nothing far from what teenagers encounter everyday. This book gives teenagers someone in literature that they are able to relate to in one way or another. The Catcher in the Rye is not a book that will alloy young readers. The underlying theme of this book is loss of innocence. This loss occurs when a teenager makes the change to adulthood where he or she is obscured by phoniness. By banning this book from schools, the only thing that teenagers would be sheltered from is reality.