Charlie Chaplin’s “The Kid” and Rowan Atkinson’s “Mr. Bean” Essay

The most app bent similarity between these two ingests is that some(prenominal) films brook around around the daily lives of the main characters.The main characters, Charlie and Mr. bean, in The take in and Mr. Bean The last accident Movie individually, both have child-like qualities, and the list to be rather mischievous. Mr. Bean is naive and self-centered, sometimes to the extent of go somewhat correspond. Despite his consid timeble age, he still sleeps cuddled up with his elusion bear bear. Nothing is sacred to him, and he plays his games with an earnest sheepishness. His childish directness and h adeptsty, period offensive at times, be his sharpest weapons. The little adventures he gets into usually revolve around the foibles of British life and the waggery of embarrassment. He is practically friend-less (save for his teddy bear), and is an outcast, just like Charlie, the main character of The baby.Charlie is a tramp animateness in the slumps of South London w ho, while walking around one day, stumbles upon a crying despoil that had been abandoned on a motorbus of garbage. Instead of ignoring the desperate cries of the infant or throwing it into the nearest sewer, he displays the more compassionate side of human nature by taking the baby with him and caring for it like a father. When the child is taken is away from him, he naturally gets very upset, and with a child-like recklessness, embarks on a journey to get him back, a process which includes pursuing the orphanage van over rooftops to educe into the back of the truck, then dispatching the official who had taken the child away.These two characters are excessively similar in their disregard for established values and the practical consequences of their actions. Their quaintness manifests itself in the unconventional way in which they analyze and then campaign to move over the best out of whatever military post they find themselves in, clarification obstacles and solving proble ms that come, their way, with a have a never-say-die perspective in their attempts to somehow belong to the society.Both films, creation plantalistic, reflect the contour of the society at the particular point of time it was made these altogether materials have been slightly distorted, with symbolism and visual exaggeration macrocosm apply to bring out the core messages their creators aimed to convey to the viewing audience, while giving the films a comic effect.As Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie was a more recent film The banter was made several decades earlier to it the technology available to the creators of each film differed greatly. At the time of The Kids production, a thing such as annotate television system was not heard of and unfathomed had not yet been introduced into the production of films The Kid was a silent, b inadequacy-and-white film while Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie was one with discolor, sound, and certain special effects such as ha ving its main character, Mr. Bean, falling from the sky as the credits rolled. It would be out(predicate) to create such effects in Charlie Chaplins time.Also callable to the different eras in which these films were made, the scenario of each plot also differed. In the gaffe of The Kid, it was a film made in the era of the Great printing and the aftermath of demesne War 1, and with the twin themes of emotional loss and homelessness being haunting motifs in its plot, it is a poignant social commentary of the displaced refugee children of World War 1, and for the persons grieving for loved ones whose lives were sacrificed in that war. The opening title, A buffoonery with a smileand perhaps a tear, sums it up. This film intercommunicate social and political issues of the day, and that was an admirable feat in itself considering the fact that this film did not have the advantage of synchronized sound for dialogue nor colour for its images.Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie, o n the other hand, has its plot found on a much lighter theme. It generally pokes harmless diversion at the rigid and uptight stereotype we have of positionmen by get-go traceing a typical Englishman, Mr. Bean himself, in a typically English environment, then later puttinghim in an international environment. being release in 1997 it is a light-hearted satire of how the more conservative English society reacts to and attempt to adapt to rapidly changing international standards and the shifts in power.The main difference of these two pics is that The Kid aims to bring some cling to to its audiences hearts by showing how joy can still be found in the gloomiest conditions (as depicted in the daily lives of Charlie and the child he has adopted) and also to reflect the state of the society while Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie seeks to bring some comic relief into the highly stressful life mode of the modern-day individual, by actually letting them jest at a highly exaggerat ed, and therefore comic, version of themselves.As mentioned earlier, the era in which Charlie Chaplins The Kid was made did not allow for colour or sound to be incorporated into its production. Being disadvantaged in this area, the actors in the film had to make up for it by emphasizing on facial expressions and body movements, in order to express thoughts and emotions, and also to give certain unique mannerisms and character traits of the various characters in the story. Modern-day audiences who are unaccustomed to this form of acting might feel uncomfortable backwash films from the silent era, beca affair the actors may seem to them, to be over-acting to an outrageous degree.However, it is also payable to the same reason as to why silent movies tend to be more popular than modern-day comedy as overacting is a natural form of comedy. One example would be the fight convulsion in which Charlie defends the child from the Bully. The moves require both grace and precise comic-timing Chaplins talent was apparent in this scene as he manages to make even a brawl seem funny without the use of colour, sound or special effects. Title were also edited to clarify the on-screen post to the viewers or add critical dialogue when there was an peremptory need to.As for Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie, dialogue is being kept to a minimum. The creators of this movie probably wanted the focus of the viewers attention to be Mr. Beans immature, self-centered, and sometimesoutright mean persona and how these character traits of his actively contribute to the various sticky situations he often finds himself in. The dialogue in this film is mainly used to depict his mood or immediate response to certain occurrences, and from that, the viewers form a deeper impression of his character. Dialogue is seldom used to make know to the audience the plans the characters has in mind to tackle his problems. Mr. Bean almost everlastingly executes his impractical ideas and solutions i mmediately after he is faced with the problem.This deliberate lack of dialogue somehow suggests the unwillingness to share ideas, the impulsiveness to carry out ideas without consultation, and the round disregard for the welfare and feelings of others that will be affected by his actions. equal sound effects were used to further enhance the various moods of the scenes and these sounds also give viewers a clue of the magnitude and severity of the situation Mr. Bean has once again landed himself in.Both films make use of physical comedy extensively to bring out the comic typefaces of their respective characters. The signature French-kick displayed by Charlie when he was with the child was one example. Throughout the movie The Kid, this French-kick motion of Charlies is being executed frequently other actions of this physique are often employed to enhance the overall comic aspect of the movie. In Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie, the use of physical comedy was also evident thr oughout the entire show, with Mr. Bean trying to determine his perpetually unceasing string of problems with a clumsy and impractical style of doing so, a style that is typically his.The characters in The Kid had to endure poverty, homelessness, and uttermost(prenominal) loneliness they are exposed to the harsher aspect of life. Mr. Bean, however, had a job and a decent place to live in the only unhappy moments he ever experiences are when his plans backfire. These moments of unhappiness are very short-lived. Therefore the characters in Chaplins film definitely possessed more emotional sagacity than those in Rowan Atkinsons movie.Bibliography*http//www.dvdreview.com/fullreviews/bean.shtml*http//www.american.edu/academic.depts/soc/run.html*http//indigo.ie/obrienh/bean.htm*http//www.american.edu/academic.depts/soc/kid.html*http//www.wikipedia.org/wiki/1921_in_film*http//wso.williams.edu/dgerstei/chaplin/charlie-the-kid.html*http//math.gc.cuny.edu/Charlie_Chaplin_bio.html*http//www. gltech.org/Death%20of%20a%20Salesman/Dramatic%20Terms.htm*http//www.tvguide.com/movies/database/ShowMovie.asp?MI=38984*http//www.moviesunlimited.com/musite/product.asp?sku=043041*http//www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_film*http//guweb2.gonzaga.edu/ force/wheeler/lit_terms_Q-Z.htmllit.terms.S.Anchor*http//www.epinions.com/content_29557624452*http//www.historychannel.com/cgi-bin/frameit.cgi?p=http%3A//www.historychann