Wednesday, February 27, 2019
Private and Public Culture: Redefining the Borders Essay
Although defining culture into a universal definition that fits any social or academic mold provoke be a daunting task (Fischer, 2007), it is safe to say that every person in this human beings belongs to a certain culture. Recent trends in the demographics of America visualise exactly the possibility of separate cultures interacting, in that respectby indicating that multiple cultures flourish on that part of the world (Kim, 2001). In a larger sense, each republic across the globe is headquarters to a wide variety of cultures.The plenty who belong to each of these cultures certainly have their own cultural affiliations and the groups of peck in each society also have their own as a collective body. As a result, a person, according to Richard Rodriguez, can become soul who is a part of a crowd and some oneness who is distinct from it. But is there really a distinction amongst public culture and private culture to begin with? To say the least, the judgement of a private cul ture presumes the existence of a culture that is dislocated in nature and is different from opposite cultures.A private culture, therefore, is one that is single(a) and cannot be easily absorbed by a distant entity. If there are private culturesindeed, if there are isolated and exclusive culturesit is difficult to view why cultures sometimes overlap with one an opposite, why one culture shares several basic yet significant characteristics with other cultures, or why people have the tendency to absorb other cultures when the necessity and the situation call for it?I think there are no innate differences between public and private cultures simply because the flavor of culture, in my opinion, is a state of the mind. Culture is something that is conditioned during the extent of a persons life. It is something that is taught and passed-on from one generation to the next as a mental idea that seeks to differentiate the self within the group from other groups. In reality, that stat e of mind is only an excuse for intolerance when there should be no reason to sow hatred or insensibility on the basis of cultural distinctions.Such distinctions do not accommodate actual value that is worth propagating for we live in a world where the only culture that exists is the culture of piece. That being said, there is a unavoidableness for college students to search for more than what we have at home simply because the home is not a bottomless source of information. To know the world close to and appreciate it in its whole us is to go beyond the limitations compel by the social institution of family.The task of understanding the rest of humanity requires us to step out of the comfort zones provided by homes and to come personal with people around us. thither is the culture called humanity waiting to be explored outside the home. The foundation that our families provide is incomplete in much the resembling way as that which society and our peers expect of us is simil arly partial. There is need to explore both areas because they are two sides of the same move in a manner of speaking. Initially, we are armed with information provided to us by our families.To develop into more complete human beings, we need to cumulate more comprehensive information from other sources such as orb fixing institutions and social groups. However, breaking away from our families does not mean abandoning them in all for the sake of living a more rounded life. While it is admittedly that we need to severe ourselves from the clutches of our families at some point in time, it does not necessarily mean that we also have to totally will them or leave them behind never to return again.What is needed is to learn to remove the limits imposed to us by our families in our attempt to understand the society and the rest of humanity while not failing to look upon our so-called roots and tap them whenever the need arises. References Fischer, M. M. J. (2007). Culture and Cult ural outline as Experimental Systems. Cultural Anthropology, 22(1), 1-65. Kim, E. Y. (2001). The Yin and Yang of American Culture A Paradox. capital of the United Kingdom Intercultural Press.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment