Why Plea Bargaining in Criminal Trials is Important :: Plea Bargain Trial Court Justice Essays

Why Plea Bargaining in Criminal Trials is of import Screeech That is the sound of our court system coming to a grindinghalt, if supplication negociate were no longer utilize. Not only does prayer bargainsave taxpayers an enormous amount of money, it often provides the evidence for a disapprobation and allows public defenders and other court officials to concentratetheir limited resources on much important or difficult cases. Some great deal may intrust that plea bargaining with criminals is wrong. The entire basis of theargument against plea bargaining says that criminals should not testify or haveanything to do with the prosecution because they were gnarly with the crime.We fail to realize that without plea bargaining many criminals would nalways bepunished for their crimes at all. It is as simple as that. Granted, a pleabargain is, by definition, a compromise. But it is a compromise that is suddenly necessary for the judicial system to function. While it may seemthat a person who exchanges his testimony for a lighter sentence would have sufficient motivation to lie in court the fact is that his testimony is exactlyverifying the testimonies of other witnesses. In a majority of cases pleabargains is utilized to ensure that the truly guilty criminal is punished. Inour less than unadulterated world, plea bargaining is easily the lesser of the evils. I agree with the definitions submitted by the affirmative speaker. Americans have always emphasized getting a seam done. We place a greatdeal of value on strength and industry. The government is expected to runwith efficiency and operate with the good of the people in mind. Every aspectof our lives is governed by this utilitarian value. Why do we place suchimportance on efficiency? Because without it nothing would ever get done. Ifwe all constantly obsessed over minute inside information and unrealistic ideals we wouldlive in poverty. In the real world compromises argon made because without th em noamount of success could ever be achieved. In the words of John Stewart Mill,the father of utilitarianism, The creed which accepts as the foundation of ethics utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions areright in ratio as they promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the bring up of happiness. This means that in a world of compromise, the mostsuccess is achieved by giving the greatest good to the greatest number of people. This precept applies directly to plea bargaining.